Disenfranchised Citizen

Chicago Photography, New Orleans Stories and Everywhere Politics…

6 Responses

Subscribe to comments with RSS.

  1. I have to agree. I attended one of these conferences myself just to see what he had to say (lie). He fed a good story to the crowd. Answered the questions with what he thought they wanted to hear. I have never heard such BS in my life. “If you cant wait the 90 days for your claim to be approved, we will give you a supplymental check while you wait.” Mr. Feinberg, everyone who has filed a claim cannot are in desperate need of their funds, who can wait 90 days? Are you going to send a supplemental check to every claimaint? And if you can send a supplemental check right away, why not just send their entire claim amount? I mean, afterall, if you reviewed their claim enough to find that they do indeed need a supplemental, then why not the entire amount, right? Because their claim proved to be beneficial enough to get a partial payment. What are you going to do, continue to review the claim, then deny their remainder? Makes no sense. “The GCCF does not release your personal information or any information you provide with your claim to NO ONE! WE (the GCCF) keep your information confidential and will always keep it that way even when the claims process is over!” Now who buys that one? If that wer true, then why does it take them 90 days to approve your claim? Then why do they state in their disclosure that you have to sign otherwise? I know of someone’s claim that was being reviewed informations was released to someone outside of the GCCF to review, who claimed to be a CPA. When their licensure was looked up on the State website, this persons licensure did not exist. Explain that Mr. Feinberg. Also, another person at the conference stated he was a CPA for over 30 years who has prepared multiple claims for his clients, some of those being denied, and others paid. He also got a call from someone claiming to be a CPA reviewing one of his clients claims. After speaking to the person on the phone claiming to be a CPA, the real CPA stated he could tell within minutes this person was not a CPA and did not know what the hell he was talking about. In other words Mr. Feinberg, you have people who are reviewing peoples claims who do not have a clue as to what they are doing or looking at. And most those claims are denied because instead of asking questions to clarify any misunderstandings, they just extract them from their desk and let the poor soul start all over again.

    I also noticed at the conference when people addressed you about their personal claim and needing help now, not 90 days from now, you told them to meet you after the conference and you would see to it they would get a check now to hold them over. However, when the conference was over you split!!!

    And for my last point….. there were many who showed up on the behalf of others who filed a claim. These people were either their alternate contact person as listed on their claims, or their representatives. However, we found that your less than capable staff would not let these people ask questions and get answers for the people they were there to represent. Your staff told the people for security reasons, only the claimant could ask questions and get answers pertaining to their claim. But for however many days, months have passed, your GCCF staff has had no problem talking to these alternate contacts concerning every shred of information pertaining to these same claims. Your procedures for doing things with this claim process is like being stuck in a torndado. You never know from one second to the next what you are going to run into and what you will be hit with. You had no intentions of letting alternate contacts or other representatives get answers this day as opposed to the last eight months, you should have notified the public prior to your conference.

    I think someone who is internet and website savy, needs to prepare a website that claimants can go to and post to traumatic experiences and complaints, then somehow forward all that information to BP, Obama, and each States governement offices- Gov.,AG,SA.

    Reilly

    January 20, 2011 at 9:20 AM

    • Thank you for a great rundown of the meeting…and as for that website…also, a good idea…perhaps you could be the one to do so? There are a lot of people up here who would be glad to help you set it up, myself included and it’s not that hard…until i started all this eight months ago, I’d never done it before either…

      -Drake

      Drake Toulouse

      January 20, 2011 at 9:28 AM

    • I worked on the beach at a hotel PT and was laid off due to the spill. This PT job helped me pay for medications and treatments due to a severe life limiting illness-we are not talking a trivial health issue here, but one which had me on hospice just a cple years ago. This condition requires expensive meds and treatment. After losng my job, I now cannot afford and have had to put off vital heart procedures because there is no money to make it happen. BP’s fault that I have health issues? of course not, but it is at least partialy thier fault I dont have the job that helped me survive this illness up to this point. I have put off a vital heart procedure twice now, and it appears I will have to put it of again because even after I scheduled it for 90 days later, my claim-and all the others-will not be processed in the promised 90 days. The 90 day line, is utter BS people, dont beleive it. I talked to a rep 3 times now at the claims office who finally admitted that the 90 days wasnt “written in stone”, and he wasnt sure when that 90 days would start-from when it was received, when they started working on it, or maybe when hell freezes over, he didnt know. And even if it is reveiwed, it will likely be whittled down to nothing or denied outright as Im hearing many have been with emergency payments, and even more will be with finals. “Escalation” is a fantasy that now GCCF finally admits today doesnt exist. Youll wait your turn, no matter if your dying or just are under a “hardship” for that new car down payment. All the sudden, GCCF is concerned with “fairness” in the process..LMAO> I suppose it wasnt a issue when some people lost thier jobs entirely, and were denied, while others received 20K and remained at work with little or no loss. Yes, we are supposed to be so stupid as to beleive fairness is on Feinberg’s mind in this matter. Hes basically put in print that he doesnt give a damn about what your situation is, all claims are equally fraudulent as far as hes concerned…I mean really, It is in the interest of fairness that a person about to lose thier home , health, or in this case possibly even thier life,is of no more concern than a person who still has a job but is just “under hardship” with his car payment?? Dont take my word for, read the latest post on the GCCF website-no more escalation, Feinberg has found “fairness.”
      I understand that money just cant be handed out to everyone that requests it, and that some claims are fraudulent. But lumping them all together as fraudulent is unethical and a fine example of how someone should have paid better attention in logic class in law school. THey act as if your being unreasonable for needing timely help…I mean who has 90 days worth of “spare money ” laying around in a economy where people survive check to check, even without chronic medical needs like mine? What average person can go 90 days without a income? Feinberg says youll have to and be damned your problems, all you people out there not getting your meds, losing your homes and businesses…your just being unfair trying to get your claims settled as quick as possible as Feinberg is concerned. Wow, Feinberg and the GCCF calling someone unfair. Hed maken a fine politician, seems hes mastered the arts of hypocrisy, lying, and spin. Watch out, hell be in Congress one day.

      Scott

      January 26, 2011 at 1:58 PM

  2. thanks man for speaking out, i hope more will do the same. i really want someone who was part of the clean up process who saw and sneaked some pictures of the reported death gyros in the gulf to do so. cause i just cant belive the offical numbers of deada nimals is correct.

    matthew

    January 20, 2011 at 11:05 AM

    • Agreed; BP and government still actively trying to keep press away from Gulf and shorelines…working on that for maybe tomorrow…

      -Drake

      Drake Toulouse

      January 20, 2011 at 11:14 AM


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: