Archive for the ‘but what a charmer’ Category
Ever read an article that you found to be so well written, informative and funny (cause its true) you felt the need to put it out there and share? Yeah, me too…from the wonderful writers at Cracked, enjoy this article about the wealthy gaffe-challenged –
“All of a sudden, it’s like you can’t make huge amounts of money without people getting all pissed off about it. And it’s only going to get worse — with the election coming up and the weather getting warmer, this whole “Occupy” movement is probably going to come back strong. The 1 percent will feel even more besieged than before.
“What the hell?” you’re probably thinking, if you’re somehow both rich and reading an article with this title, “I didn’t crash the economy!” You might even be tempted to take to a microphone, to defend yourself and your wealthy friends. But before you do, I want you to stop and ask yourself, “Will this make me sound like an out-of-touch douchebag?”
Continue reading…trust me, it’s worth it.
Have a nice day.
So, if a state representative from Tennessee says the following about any possible encounter with someone transgendered in a dressing room:
“I believe if I was standing at a dressing room and my wife or one of my daughters was in the dressing room and a man tried to go in there — I don’t care if he thinks he’s a woman and tries on clothes with them in there — I’d just try to stomp a mudhole in him and then stomp him dry. Don’t ask me to adjust to their perverted way of thinking and put my family at risk. We cannot continue to let these people dominate how society acts and reacts….”
Am I then free to respond by saying to Rep Floyd how it is my sincerest hope I may someday encounter him, outside a dressing room, when someone transgendered tries to enter, so that if he does lay a finger upon this person, I could then lay ten fingers upon him until he is a writhing mass on the ground outside said dressing room?
Or, would saying something like that be illegal, you know, because he holds elected office? Just curious, just asking, because I wouldn’t want to get in trouble for writing what some might construe as a threat to a politician in response to him threatening Tennessee citizens.
So, help me out people…is it wrong to point out another small man, living in fear, whose only courageous act is to brazenly exhibit his worst character traits and utter ignorance when it comes to stepping outside his own, immediate worldview, and then shake my head, annoyed with the abject idiocy of the people some of my fellow citizens deem worthy of holding elected office?
Please, let me know…I don’t need a hassle and I don’t want to break any laws, even by accident.
Have a nice day.
So, I keep reading these bits about Madonna, about her freaking out because some fan gave her hydrangeas, as in flowers, and it turns out she hates hydrangeas so she trashed the flowers in front of the fan, and not content to humiliate the person once, she then made a spoof video where she trashed the flowers again so the moment could live on in internet history.
Maybe the whole thing was a big gag, maybe not. In any case, soon thereafter at the Toronto Film Festival, apparently some sort of tradition exists where orange-clad volunteers get a big thank you at the end of the show and word is, when Madonna presented the film she directed, these volunteers were ordered to turn their backs and not look her in the eye. Again, maybe it was all a big joke but if not, then the joke would apparently be…well I suppose the joke would be Madonna.
So, why might I write about something like this?
I often write about equality, tolerance, about simple care for other people. I loathe any type of caste separation, which is becoming more and more prevalent in the world and in this country. Sure, nothing politically or culturally official in America, at least not yet…but when politicians refer to welfare recipients as raccoons, or right winged commentators say the poor shouldn’t be allowed to vote and when Tea Party assholes cheer, suggesting an uninsured patient should be allowed to die, what are we supposed to think about what this future might bring to the United States?
Anyways…yeah, Madonna’s a good business person, but artistically she’s a con artist and a hack and not worth this country’s spit, while these political commentators, politicians and tea party types, they deserve nothing more than the back of this country’s hand, hard, painful and ugly…and repeatedly while we read them the Bill of Rights and discuss how we’re only as strong as our weakest link, and weakest ain’t necessarily about how much money you got.
It might have something to do with your character, and those idiots previously mentioned? Oh, they got a lot of self-righteousness, ego and money, but character?
No, not so much. Not that I’m all that much better, but at least I’m honest about it… Oh, and when we’re done explaining how people of a lower tax bracket don’t need to be made to feel like 2nd class citizens in this oh so great land of equality, we’ll take some time to stuff your mouths full of hydrangeas, lots of hydrangeas, a ton of hydrangeas…and not one single solitary slice of cake.
Have a nice day.
The Gulf Coast Claims Facility was created with the stated purpose of handling claims brought by the people so harmed when British Petroleum spilled millions of barrels of oil into the Gulf of Mexico. It was supposed to be done fairly, and with haste and this was promised by its neutral arbitrator, Ken Feinberg.
Neither appears to have happened.
The claims process is not perceived as fair. Oil industry workers have been left out in the cold. The GCCF has denied claims British Petroleum had previously paid. Some claimants receive quick money and speedy service while others are given denials and a return of their paperwork marked as deficient for the smallest mistake on a form, which in turn starts their waiting periods all over again. And let us not forget the repeated denials of subsistence claims.
The claims process is not being done quickly. GCCF online forms have errors, resulting in returned documents with residents of the Gulf Coast being told different things at different times by employees of the GCCF, all bogging down the process. There have been arbitrary rule changes, and no transparency which leaves residents often in the dark about why their claims have been denied, and due to their financial need for resolution, then assail the GCCF with questions which remain, unanswered.
Feinberg has gone on for months about poor documentation in the claims, and how it has slowed down his system, seemingly placing the blame back squarely on Gulf Coast residents, on the injured parties…and what does this do?
It creates discord amongst claimants, and it deflects anger from the parties in this mess who truly deserve it: the GCCF, British Petroleum and the President, who appears content to do little about it.
Consider these two attempts at receiving the quick payment:
“I have a coworker whose husband filed a quick business claim. Received it within 14 days.”
“I downloaded and submitted my quick pay form on the 17th, mailed it overnight immediately. The cost was 20.00. They received the form on the 20th and I then waited… called everyday to make sure everything was okay and was told for 12 days straight that the forms I had submitted looked good and I should expect payment within 14 days. On or around the 10th day into my wait, watching the online GCCF statistics I quickly began to feel “leery” about the forms. If the GCCF was indeed paying so many claims according to their website, something was definitely not right. So, I downloaded another form around the 29th and just mailed it into the GCCF regular mail (since surely this was my paranoia getting to me) after all, I had written emails from the GCCF and phone calls reassuring me that I would receive payment in a day or two. WRONG!!! I found out at Propublica.com via a common thread based on happenings with various claimants, the GCCF had sent out a mass letter to claimants which stated the downloaded forms had “changed” in the download process
I immediately called the GCCF and the blame for the faulty form was placed on me… then I was told over and over to wait for the new packet because that was the only accepted form. After all, they did not tell people to use the online method, but told them to use the mailed packet… so… it was my fault, I had indeed read all of the information provided on the GCCF wrong. I did download another form at that time, filled it out completely and mailed it overnight to the GCCF… another 30.00 (FEDEX) I waited, I emailed, I called and yes, they did indeed receive that package on the 30th, it was date-stamped and scanned… I was getting paid within 14 days. Then on the 3rd of January I finally received in the mail the packet they had mailed to claimants with the forms (completely blank) to fill out.. so… me and my paranoia filled that complete form out and mailed it FEDEX another 30.00
I called, I emailed, then lo and behold they receive the forms that I had sent via regular mail and I am now being told that I will be paid from the date-stamp January 3rd! What happened to the Dec. 30th date-stamped form?
So, I waited, I emailed, I called and suddenly my date-stamp is January 4th so I am waiting 14 days from January 4th now and who in the hell am I to ask what happened to my “corrected forms” I mailed in, and they date stamped on Dec. 30 and on January 3rd…yet… the numbers on the website show that the statistics are off the charts and people are being paid in two-three days! Again, this was never an issue with the quick pay personal claims, but it was the same exact form… all downloaded from the GCCF.”
Some people get paid, quick and easy, the way they were promised.
Some people are still waiting to be paid after going to great lengths, sending in duplicate forms, covering their bases so to speak, and feeling the need to do so oftentimes as a result of the lack of transparency, the unanswered questions, the false information relayed to them by GCCF employees and the GCCF website.
And some get denied outright.
As a result, some people caught up in or rejected by the claims process are beginning to turn on each other. Resentments grow against the people who at least got something from the people who have been denied everything. People who were paid quickly brush off the complaints of those who haven’t, telling them to just sit quiet and be patient. The frustration of the people jumping through hoops and still waiting boils over onto everyone.
All while Barack Obama remains quiet.
All while British Petroleum stock prices continue to rise.
All while Ken Feinberg continues to massage the press, go to the opera and use British Petroleum money to pay a colleague to write a letter in his favor, declaring that he is neutral in this claims process.
Dividing an angry public against each other while politicians, big business and those otherwise in charge go about their day is one of the most tried and true political tactics used in our society, having been implemented time and time again. Why? Because it works…so has this been the intent of Ken Feinberg and the GCCF all along?
Difficult to say, but I might ask who has been acting like the politician?
Well, Ken Feinberg was named one of the 100 most influential people in finance by Treasury and Risk, and one doesn’t rise to such heights without a healthy dose of political savvy and connection. And if you should be one of the people who attends his meetings this week in the Gulf Coast, the question and answer sessions being held on Monday and Tuesday, one might ask, does it feel like a politician’s town hall meeting? And if so, does it feel like you’re being emotionally managed at this meeting, as a group, or will your complaints actually change the course of action by the GCCF?
Division amongst Gulf Coast residents only serves the interests of British Petroleum and the GCCF. It serves as a distraction and an energy drain from the protestations that should continue to be directed towards the guilty parties. What is needed now is unity amongst claimants, approved and denied, and whereas nobody can say for sure whether this growing climate of resentment has been fostered intentionally, it would be difficult to argue that British Petroleum, the originator of this whole mess, isn’t reaping the benefit.
Keep the pressure on all the guilty parties, together.
Have a nice day.
So, when you saw footage of the Deepwater Horizon explosion or the oil blasting out of the Macondo Well, what did you think about it?
The New York Times described it this way:
“Dazed and battered survivors, half-naked and dripping in highly combustible gas, crawled inch by inch in pitch darkness, willing themselves to the lifeboat deck. . . . Crew members, certain they were about to be cooked alive, scrambled into enclosed lifeboats for shelter, only to find them like smoke-filled ovens.”
Well, that would be one perspective (from those alarmists on the liberal left), however Rep. Ralph Hall (R-Tx) saw things differently. He described it kinda like…no, he described it exactly like this:
As we saw that thing bubbling out, blossoming out – all that energy, every minute of every hour of every day of every week – that was tremendous to me. That we could deliver that kind of energy out there – even on an explosion.
Yeah, I’m too cynical in my beliefs and opinions…how about if I mentioned that Mr. Hall is about to become the chair of the House Science and Technology committee.
Have a nice day.
When it comes to long term damage to the Gulf of Mexico from BP’s oil spill, the University of South Florida, the Coast Guard and even Ken Feinberg have offered their expert and not so expert opinions.
The University of South Florida, in a recent study found layers of residue up to several centimeters thick in spots that span across several thousand miles of the seafloor and more importantly, in many of those spots the sea life that crawls across the sediment appears dead. Tests are beginning to show the residue is from BP’s Macondo well and the dead sea creatures are the bottom rung of the food chain in the Gulf. Their findings indicate the future impact is as yet unknown, and won’t be for some time. Incidentally, the NOAA has also been testing the sediment and found the oil in the sediment to be a match to the Macondo.
A week after the release of USF’s findings, the Coast Guard also issued a report and surprise, it directly contradicts the university’s report, “We are not finding any recoverable amounts of oil” on the seafloor, Rear Adm. Paul Zukunft said. “We are dealing with barely detectable amounts of oil in the parts per billion in many places.” The parts per billion they could find, the Coast Guard was unable to link to the Macondo. They also stressed the report was not a conclusive analysis, but intended more as a guide for the Coast Guard and cleanup crews, not as an assessment of the spill’s damage to the ecosystem.
Needless to say, Ian McDonald, an oceanographer from USF was surprised, “We went to the same place and saw a lot of oil,” MacDonald said. “In our samples, we found abundant dead animals. It points out that different people – trained scientists – can get different answers.”
Also needless to say, British Petroleum? They love themselves some Coast Guard reportage, “The scientific evidence in this report is consistent with our observations that the beaches are safe, the water is safe and the seafood is safe,” said Mike Utsler, BP’s cleanup commander.
And then Ken Feinberg wades in to give his expert(?) opinion: “We’re asking everybody right now, scientists, biologists, give us your best estimate … of the status of the Gulf,” Feinberg said. “We’re hearing right now, not much long-term adverse impact.”
Kert Davies, director of research for the environmental group Greenpeace, fired back by saying Feinberg’s assessment is premature. “We’re talking about a very complex system, and it’s impossible to say there’s minimal long-term impact at this point,” Davies said.
So then, to sum up:
The University of South Florida stakes their science department’s reputation on their findings and stands by them. These findings indicate the oil is there and a lot of it is BP’s oil, sunk by the dispersants, and wherever that oily sediment is found it is killing off coral and the other sea life that forms the lower rungs of the food chain. They are continuing to study the long term ramifications. The Coast Guard, much like they appear unable to find oil when it is on the surface also can’t find it on the seafloor and then they strangely issue the caveat that their analysis shouldn’t be taken as conclusive. Ken Feinberg…well, he thinks things are looking rosier than ever and tells this to USA Today, a national publication, while also talking about his oil spill claim options and since things are looking pretty good, hey everybody, you should probably all choose the best option for you, so long as it is the two options that bar you from suing BP. Why would ya wanna sue BP? Things are good and getting better! And those pesky interim payments, that second option, well, since I’m the one deciding whether you are still suffering damages from the spill every three months and since I’ve indicated in the national press that it is my belief that things in the Gulf are shaping up, well take a guess whether I will be thinking three months, six months, nine months down the road that you are still suffering damages.
In other words…take the money, now…no pressure. The University of South Florida, the ones without direct financial incentive, they might be wrong.
Have a nice day.